A focused report
Document the strengths, evidence and points to investigate for a specific tool.
Choose the right digital tools.
With a documented assessment.
Assess a technology, compare solutions or find relevant patient resources. Get an analysis you can use to select, deploy or invest.
An assessment deliverable
you can put to work.
A comparison of solutions
Compare options using the same criteria, aligned with your decision.
A resource selection
Receive patient resources selected for your population, program or existing website.
Monitoring and updates
Follow new resources and changes to the tools relevant to your field.
What decision
do you need to make?
Select resources for your patients
For pharma, health organizations and pharmacy banners: commission an assessment or a curated selection for your population or therapeutic area, as a standalone service or within an AppGuide program.
Assess a tool for your clinical teams
Scope a mandate to compare professional tools, build an assessment framework or audit a vendor, using the documentation needed for your decision.
Examine a technology before investing
A focused vetting mandate reviews clinical relevance, available evidence and adoption conditions. Receive findings, evidence gaps and questions to investigate.
A clear mandate.
A usable result.
01
Define your question
Agree on the tool or field, intended use, criteria, deliverable and timeline.
02
Examine the information
Our team reviews the evidence and documentation, with vendor input when the mandate requires it.
03
Put findings to work
Receive a documented analysis with its scope, limits and points to investigate. Agree on updates if needed.
How do patient-resource and clinician-tool assessments differ?
Patient resources
Proactive screening identifies candidates for curated programs. Selected resources are assessed for the intended population and clinical scope. An assessment can also be commissioned on its own; a listed resource is not necessarily already assessed.
Tools for clinicians
We assess these tools as part of a commissioned project, rather than systematically in advance. Scope, documentation and vendor input are defined for the intended use and risk. Public data alone is not presented as a complete evaluation.
Scope, confidentiality and any conflicts of interest are addressed before a mandate begins.
AppGuide Review.
The platform behind the analysis.
Our team uses Review to filter health apps, review assessment data and prepare monitoring reports. The platform supports our work and client mandates; access is provided as part of a mandate.
Use the selection in your project
Receive the agreed report or selection, launch a branded program or discuss API integration into an existing tool.
Let’s scope your
resource assessment.
Define the resources, criteria and deliverable with our evaluation team.